3 The World‎ > ‎6 Events‎ > ‎

9/11

UNFINISHED -

PLEASE NOTE THAT SOME OF THE FILMS HERE ARE JUNK AND ILLUSTRATE THE IGNORANCE OF THOSE POSTING THEM IE THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT PHYSICS OR CHEMISTRY. OTHERS OFFER INTERESTING VIEW POINTS. I HAVE NOT AS YET EXAMINED THEM FULLY AND SO DO NOT COMMENT.

JUST BECAUSE A FILM IS HERE DOESN'T MEAN IT ISN'T RUBBISH.


I shall continue with this once I have more ideas about propaganda.



"The most effective propaganda generating machine is the people themselves, they are the most dangerous thing on the planet, and if truth will never prevail it will be because of them!!" These are my feelings.


DO SCROLL DOWN FOR MORE


JFK and 9/11 - Insights Gained From Studying Both

Peter Dale Scott




Overall

Allagations

The allegations are that;

1) Warnings from of the impending attack were ignored.

2) Normal FAA Hijack procedures not followed

3) Change of procedure prior to 9/11 

4) Fighters moved to Iceland 2001 (for Operation Northern Guardian?)

5) Stolen Gold. 9-11 WTC biggest gold heist in history: $300 Billion in bars

6) Jury awards $2.2 billion


YouTube Video



The World Trade Centre

Allagations

Allegation: Explosives in Building?

Allegation: The World Trade Centre collapse was the result of explosives placed in the building.

Evidence:

1) No tower has collapsed even in far worse fires

2) The foundation was broken and so might have been broken by explosives.

Refutation:

1) Nobody heard the normal bangs you would expect from demolition explosions at the time of collapse. There were only a few explosions in the building.

2) The World Trade Centre towers were not constructed like any other tower before or since. The main load bearing was done by the outer structure.

Allegation: Insufficient investigation of rubble?




The Pentagon

Allagations

3) It was not a plane that hit the pentagon it was something else.


West palm beach

YouTube Video




YouTube Video





YouTube Video



Allagations and Defences

Quite Technical Stuff




The idea that a steel frame building won't fall down when a plane load of jet fuel arrives and that explosives must have been planted is probably an idea belonging to somebody who never worked metal in a fire. The bangs in the building were probably rivets breaking. But as usual those without any scientific knowledge come up with these ideas and leave the scientists to do the work to show it wasn't that way.

CIA Warning Memo

Was the bush administration warned of the attack which they ignored in favour of their own agenda? Read the CIA memo - Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US

Here are some views on the matter;
National Security Archive

"Bush’s former counter-terrorism chief, Richard Clarke, who told the 9/11 panel that the Bush administration took no serious action in response to multiple warnings of an impending, massive attack within the US by Al Qaeda, and then exploited the death of nearly 3,000 people on September 11, 2001 to implement an agenda for invading and occupying Iraq that had preoccupied Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and company from the outset of the Bush administration." Says the World Socialist Website. Given the actual content of the key memo, is this reasonable?

Mike Ruppert ex LAPD not only accuses the CIA of having involvement in the drug trade but also provides an interesting and in my mind the first well thought through perspective on the role of 9/11 in the US's quest to dominate the last of the oil. I would point out that 9/11 has been buried in a sea of red herrings possibly some initiated by those involved but most initiated and propagated by those with little science background who persist in distracting from the crucial points. they are the haystack around the needle of truth. The film below is the first part of 28 parts. Watch them all. Mike Ruppert is a real policeman.

YouTube Video




YouTube Video



Events have provoked this view America's Imperial Design. Prompt Global Strike: World Military Superiority Without Nuclear Weapons.

Oh and just to debunk the film above. Do notice the nice music!

YouTube Video


I don't accept that this film shows it was molten aluminium because the composition of dust on the ground was supposedly analysed and found to contain the military version of Thermite. Well did it or didn't it? The liquid metal that fell should is better analysed on the ground. The red colour of the liquid is dependent on temperature only, not composition. When I played around with copper I could see that glow red outdoors just about when it melted at about 1000C but they say steel loses 90% of its strength at these temperatures but that this would not compromise a building... see this about steel.

Also it seems that unreacted Active Thermitic Material was found on the ground.

There is of course the possibility that these are all red herrings, but one thing appears clear, it wasn't as simple as some would like to believe.


According to Richard Gage 1100 professionals are prepared to say that large buildings are constructed with explosives for demolition 50 years or so hence, built in. He states this about 3 mins 30 sec into the film. I can find no other information about large buildings with built in demolition explosives. I can draw no conclusion.


YouTube Video






Well I don't know how you take this next film. Perhaps a Rockerfeller did say these things but again this is not proof of guilt of anything and I only put this here because I don't have a place for it yet. Sorry.  It needs more investigation.


YouTube Video




Here is some pure dis-information. An under carriage that was supposedly not only planted but then replaced with a second under carriage some time later. It is likely that this has been created because any sane person would dismiss it, and hopefully the more serious stuff. The more irrelevant questions that can be asked the less people will ask the real questions, like why did fighters not scramble when planes went off course etc.?

YouTube Video